Loading... Please wait...
Mops
CLEANROOM CLEANING AGENTS AND MOP COMPARISON CHARTS
The Table below shows the effectiveness of PROTOGREENTM detergent compared to 12 Megohm DI water and a 70% Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) and 30% 12 Megohm DI water. Protogreen Cleanroom Surface Cleaner is as effective as or more effective than DI water or the IPA mixture. The average number of particles before testing were 463 @ 0.5 microns and larger and 80 @ 5.0 microns and larger.
|
WETTING AGENT |
PROTOGREEN |
12 MGOHM DI H20 |
IPA/DI 70/30 |
|||
|
PARTICLE SIZE |
0.5 MIC |
5.0 MIC |
0.5 MIC |
5.0 MIC |
0.5 MIC |
5.0 MIC |
|
NO. OF PARTICLES |
164.3 |
16 |
233.3 |
32.3 |
170.3 |
19.7 |
The table below shows the effectiveness of PROTOMOPTM cleanroom microfiber floor mop compared to a spun polycell cleanroom mop and a 100% polyester cleanroom mop.
The microfiber mop left a surface cleaner by at least 1/2 magnitude than the other two mops sampled. The average number of particles before testing were 463 @ 0.5 micronsand larger and 80 @ 5.0 microns and larger.
|
MOP TYPE |
AVERAGE # of PARTICLES AFTER MOPING |
AVERAGE # of PARTICLES BEFORE MOPING |
TIMES CLEANER |
|||
|
|
0.5 MIC |
5.0 MIC |
0.5 MIC |
5.0 MIC |
0.5 MIC |
5.0 MIC |
|
MICROFIBER |
57 |
4.83 |
463 |
80 |
8.8 |
9.4 |
|
SPUN LACE |
97 |
13.17 |
463 |
80 |
7.9 |
8.4 |
|
POLY MOP |
78 |
8.67 |
463 |
80 |
8.3 |
8.9 |
The table below shows the effectiveness of the PROTOMOPTM using PROTGREENTM cleanroom all-purpose surface cleaner. The average number of particles before testing were 463 @ 0.5 microns and larger and 80 @ 5.0 microns and larger.
|
DESCRTIPTION |
PROTOGREENTM WITH PROTOMOPTM MICROFIBER MOP |
|
|
PARTICLE SIZE |
0 .5 MIC |
5.0 MIC |
|
NO. OF PARTICLES |
41 |
3.3 |
|
LINOLEUM SURFACE - Q3 SURFACE COUNTER |
||||||
|
RESIDUE REMAINING ON SURFACE AFTER CLEANING WITH SAMPLE MOPS USING VESPHENE AND 5/95% BLEACH/DI |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPETITOR MOP A |
Vesphene |
Bleach |
|
PROTOMOP |
Vesphene |
Bleach |
|
Particles @ 0.3 mic. & > |
781 |
1,175 |
|
Particles @ 0.3 mic. & > |
261 |
282 |
|
Particles @ 0.5 mic. & > |
730 |
1,145 |
|
Particles @ 0.5 mic. & > |
227 |
250 |
|
Particles @ 1.0 mic. & > |
370 |
880 |
|
Particles @ 1.0 mic. & > |
65 |
87 |
|
Particles @ 5.0 mic. & > |
199 |
659 |
|
Particles @ 5.0 mic. & > |
18 |
31 |
|
Particles @ 10 mic. & > |
100 |
381 |
|
Particles @ 10 mic. & > |
8 |
16 |
|
Total Particles |
2,180 |
4,240 |
|
Total Particles |
579 |
666 |
|
Ave. Particulate Residue |
436 |
848 |
|
Ave. Particulate Residue |
116 |
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPETITOR MOP B |
Vesphene |
Bleach |
|
COMPETITOR MOP C |
Vesphene |
Bleach |
|
Particles @ 0.3 mic. & > |
434 |
1,087 |
|
Particles @ 0.3 mic. & > |
389 |
530 |
|
Particles @ 0.5 mic. & > |
401 |
1,075 |
|
Particles @ 0.5 mic. & > |
353 |
490 |
|
Particles @ 1.0 mic. & > |
176 |
933 |
|
Particles @ 1.0 mic. & > |
140 |
233 |
|
Particles @ 5.0 mic. & > |
76 |
735 |
|
Particles @ 5.0 mic. & > |
51 |
95 |
|
Particles @ 10 mic. & > |
39 |
430 |
|
Particles @ 10 mic. & > |
24 |
51 |
|
Total Particles |
1,126 |
4,260 |
|
Total Particles |
957 |
1,399 |
|
Ave. Particulate Residue |
225 |
852 |
|
Ave. Particulate Residue |
191 |
280 |